Search for: "United States v. Maine"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In Crosspoint Church v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
ALEC also has taken strides in coopting progressives seeking an Article V convention to reverse Citizens United. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
(Editor’s Note: The statement below is collectively signed by 22 former United Nations Special Rapporteurs and former UN experts in the field of human rights on the situation in Rafah and the obligations of UN Member States.) [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Bills restricting the use of noncompete provisions are also pending in other states, including Iowa, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
He doesn’t inspire trust or confidence in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Here is a PDF copy of the United States District Court decision: Zall v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
Common Cause, No. 18-422, Supreme Court of the United States (Mar. 9, 2019); Brief of 44 Election Law, Scientific Evidence, and Empirical Legal Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees, in Gill v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
In the course of considering certain "Special Situations" (p. 29), we consider who all might have authority to enforce Section Three with respect to the constitutional ineligibility of an individual for the office of President of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
” Indeed, they reject any difference between an “Officer of the United States” and an “Office under the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
This Note explores the evolution of the law on slavery and race in the United States prior to the Civil War, focusing on Maine and the political pressures surrounding the SJC at that time. [read post]
