Search for: "United States v. Marker" Results 81 - 100 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Finally, United States Patent No. 6,468,559 (“Chen”) […] disclosed a preferred embodiment in which “a dosage form of the invention is administered to a patient . . . preferably once a month. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:50 am
Secretary of Health and Human Services, a claim before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for damages from a documented vaccine reaction. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Michael F. Smith
Given the fundamental question it poses regarding an electorate’s right to amend its own state constitution, Schuette v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:07 pm by Maritime Blogger
Settoon is owned and operated by Settoon Towing, a Jones Act employer providing marine transportation throughout the inland waterways of the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
” It has been used consistently and exclusively for the secular purpose of honoring those who died fighting for the United States. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue has divided lower federal and state courts, and the case of King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lee E. Berlik
” The court found the tweet was not actionable “because the tweet in question constitutes ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ normally associated with politics and public discourse in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
However, in recent years, the legality of murals in the United States is not without its challenges, especially with regards to murals made by and for minority groups. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]