Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 81 - 100 of 29,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
To take an example that echoes his recent attack on Judge Merchan, in 2019 he said that a group of four minority congresswomen should “go back” to the countries they came from rather than “loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States” how to run the government.Here again, Trump is playing to a receptive audience.In recent years Congress has passed many fewer laws than it did decades ago. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to this constriction of avenues for environmental regulation is the rights of corporations to engage in political speech, following the 2010 decision Citizens United v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Retirement Investors For purposes of the new test, the Final Rule has added a new definition for the recipients of investment advice: Term Definition Retirement Investor a plan, plan participant or beneficiary, IRA, IRA owner or beneficiary, plan fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section (3)(21)(A)(i) or (iii) Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the plan, or an IRA fiduciary within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(3)(A) or (C) with respect to the IRA. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
The dispute concerns the meaning of the statutory phrase “currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am by Bona Law PC
Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) introduced S. 3686 (Preventing Algorithmic Collusion Act of 2024), which would “prohibit the use of algorithmic systems to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of leased or rented residential dwelling units in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]