Search for: "United States v. ONE DEVICE, MORE OR LESS, ETC."
Results 81 - 100
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2013, 10:05 pm
Second, the Transporter gives you more space at less cost. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
The legal framework (categories and criteria of assessment) consolidates elements coming from various sources, both internal and external to the EU: from EU State aid law to the subsidy chapters in the most recent PTAs negotiated by the EU, from multilateral trade law (see the expired presumptions in Article 6.1 WTO ASCM) to more recent subsidy initiatives (see the draft rules of the ‘Trilateral’ Initiative: January 2020). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
The last several centuries, however, have seen liberal democratic systems move toward a more hybrid position Like Marxist-Leninist systems, liberal-democratic ideologies have embraced the core premise that neither the individual nor society may be left to their own devices. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
LegalZoom, etc., will fill a legal services economic vacuum—a vacuum that the law societies refuse to try to fill, at a time when, because of the volume and complexity of laws, people have never needed lawyers more. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Gold, “The More We Know, the Less Intelligent We Are? [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
Less noise, more signal.These are the three most important appeals going on at this stage (in no particular order):Oracle's copyrightability-centric Android/Java appealGoogle's appeal of the FRAND part of Judge Posner's rulingApple's appeal of Judge Koh's denial of a permanent injunction against SamsungThe third one is the one I will focus on for the remainder of this post.The key issues of transcendental relevance in the Apple v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
They are market enhancing and demand satisfying to the extent they meet these hierarchy and status producing elements of consumption beyond satisfaction of physical need (but one wrries about the collateral effects of consumerism and consumption exploitation strengthening class stratification). [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Citizens and eligible nationals of VWP countries may apply for admission to the United States at a U.S. port of entry as nonimmigrant aliens for a period of ninety (90) days or less for business or pleasure without first obtaining a nonimmigrant visa, provided that they are otherwise eligible for admission under applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Components (central processing units, displays, etc.)In his opening presentation, Samsung's lead counsel Charles Verhoeven reportedly stated that "Samsung products comprise 26% of the component cost of the iPhone, including its flash memory and main memory", and asked: "Who is the real innovator?" [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Spanish Patents and Trademark Office (SPTO) archives (Class 46) Spains 350 Super Brands revealed (Class 46) Taiwan French luxury goods producer Hermes won a record US $7.5 million in damages in a trade mark infringement case brought against a former employee who had sold four counterfeit handbags (IPKat) (Reuters) United Kingdom UK copyright tribunal modernisation (Excess Copyright), (IPKat) The Patents, Trade Marks and Designs (Address for… [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am
Indictable charges are the more serious category of criminal charges and summary charges are the less serious category of criminal charges. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
So why do we have more than one set of laws? [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(Business IP and Intangible Assets Report and Blog) Which is more valuable: Invention or imitation? [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:20 pm
As I explained in my past last May, in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
The second move made by my progressive interlocutors is more serious, and much, much more dismaying. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Trade secrecy is perhaps a more important barrier, Ben Goldacre’s work etc. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
