Search for: "United States v. Painter" Results 81 - 100 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:40 am by Jan von Hein
Jensen: The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in Enka v Chubb On 9 October 2020 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom rendered its much-anticipated decision in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb (Enka v Chubb). [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
This article is mostly about federal courts, because reviewing just what they do is daunting enough; but I occasionally cite relevant state cases, since many state courts seem to take an approach similar to that of the federal courts. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Charges filed by UNITE HERE; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
  The Board also affirmed the judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by declaring impasse over a change in the scope of the bargaining unit. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm by Andrew Raff
United States and United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
  (Today is also the birthday of painters Goya and Van Gogh. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on  "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carpenter, Texas Wesleyan School of Law (United States) Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law (United States) Are there any outer limits? [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by Josh Blackman
And this limiting principle would avoid almost the entire parade of horribles that Colorado and the United States warned about. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am by Jennifer González
    Art and Invention Morse returned to the United States in 1815, and, in 1822, he invented a marble-cutting machine capable of carving three-dimensional sculptures in marble as well as stone. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
The Board separately remanded to the judge the claims of six other individuals for a determination of whether they were authorized to be present and employed in the United States during the backpay period and thus entitled to backpay. [read post]