Search for: "United States v. Peters"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 7:22 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:32 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:03 pm
The United State Supreme Court in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:13 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I am not an expert on the law of citizenship in the United States, but my Opinio Juris co-blogger Peter Spiro is. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:12 pm
A native of Cuba, Prieto moved to the United States with his parents when he was seven years old. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 11:05 am
United States, represents a great touchstone in the law of privacy. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:37 pm
I have spent considerable time trying to summarize United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:31 pm
After trial, however, the same court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
United States, No. 04-5286 (June 20, 2005) holding that the 1 year limitations period under 2255(3) "begins to run on the date on which this Court 'initially recognized' the right asserted in an applicant's motion, not the date on which that right was made retroactive" Peter Godlberger, through a post at BOPWatch as well as his comment at Sentencing Law and Policy here, has alerted to the importance of Dodd to persons whose sentences became final… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DAVID H. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:27 am
Joseph Miller, 63, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Peter Hartofilis, 33, Flushing, New York, Robert Hofler, 52, Pembroke Pines, Florida, and Steve Vento, 41, Jupiter, Florida, are four new defendants that have been added in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:33 pm
Overruling longstanding Third Circuit doctrine, ( See United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm
In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:13 pm
Facts: This case (Peters v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:26 pm
Peter J. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
