Search for: "United States v. Premises and Real Property"
Results 81 - 100
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 8:35 am
For example, in United Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
”Oakwood Codified Ordinance § 17-107.5The ordinance at issue (Oakwood Codified Ordinance § 17-107.5) provided that, “it shall be unlawful for the owner of any real estate premises to transfer legal or equitable ownership of that premises, or change tenants, without having obtained a pre-sale inspection of it under this code. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
”Oakwood Codified Ordinance § 17-107.5The ordinance at issue (Oakwood Codified Ordinance § 17-107.5) provided that, “it shall be unlawful for the owner of any real estate premises to transfer legal or equitable ownership of that premises, or change tenants, without having obtained a pre-sale inspection of it under this code. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:51 am
” See also Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
The Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Anastasio v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
” He had previously visited the United States in 1962 and 1968 even though, by statute, his political beliefs rendered him inadmissible. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Call a personal injury attorney immediately, not a real estate attorney. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:35 am
CBIA’s challenge is based on the premise that the conditions imposed by the ordinance constitute exactions under the takings clauses of the United States and California Constitutions. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement explains that some very real property interests are at stake in this case. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966). [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
See In re Lisowski, 395 B.R. 771, 777 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2008) (concluding that, under Wartels, the homestead exemption from forced sale applies only to improved land or real property that is owned by the debtor); Phillips v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Eventually, the state court awarded Avelar a default judgment against the mission in the amount of $475,000.Avelar filed judgment liens against the mission’s real property and attached its bank account. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
