Search for: "United States v. Santana"
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
” A lawful immigrant from the Philippines, James Garcia Dimaya has lived in the United States since 1992. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
Lohier served as a judge on the prominent antitrust case United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 9:49 am
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Nivar Santana v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
United States, 12-10638, is now most likely on hold for Robers; ditto Quince v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Weltover, a breaching party’s failure to make contractually required payments in the United States causes a “direct effect” in the United States triggering the commercial activity exception where the parties’ expectations and course of dealing have established the United States as the place of payment, or only where payment in the United States is unconditionally required by contract. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 12:50 pm
See Santana-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
CPLR § 2106 also provides: ”(b) The statement of any person, when that person is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in lieu of and with the same force and… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Santana in 2006, essential allegations are generally determined by the statute defining the crime. [read post]
