Search for: "United States v. State Bank of North Carolina" Results 81 - 100 of 281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
 The court then considered Bank of America’s place of citizenship and determined that Bank of America is also a national bank and is, therefore, a citizen of the state of North Carolina, the location of its main office. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
  Draegen is a co- founder of the company, its chief executive officer (CEO) and majority shareholder, and resides and works in North Carolina. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In 2013, North Carolina and the state Department of Natural and Cultural Resources displayed some of Nautilus’ work online without permission. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
And the credit card account at issue in Madden was presumably one of those, because the 2d Circuit opinion in Madden v Midland mentions a notice-of-change-in-terms that changed the choice-of-law state to Delaware, FIA's home state.Exemplar of Bank of America N.A. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 am by Michael Rosenblat
The district court however relied on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:03 pm by justinsilverman
The News & Observer in North Carolina used the database to help uncover “a long trail of malpractice payouts” to a partially blind neurosurgeon. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am by Alex Phipps
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on November 7, 2023. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am by Sean Wajert
The foreign subs affiliates were not registered to do business in North Carolina; had no place of business, employees, or bank accounts in the State; did not design, manufacture, or advertise their products in the state; and did not solicit business in the State or sell or ship tires to North Carolina customers. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:15 am
North Carolina "North Carolina city's interest in dispute between North Carolina and South Carolina was not sufficiently unique or compelling to justify granting city's request to intervene as separate party (Alito, J.) [read post]