Search for: "United States v. Territory of VI" Results 81 - 100 of 321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
A week ago, President Trump said: The United States of America will be designating ANTIFA as a Terrorist Organization. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
In-state/territory licensure requirements – 42 C.F.R. 455.412. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SHORT TITLE section 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Although a State appellate court has awarded a remedy for invasion of privacy on the basis of the equitable action of breach of confidence (Giller v Procopets (Vic)), that does not mean privacy has crystallised into a straightforward, juridified right in Australia: breach of confidence still requires a pre-existing relationship of confidence to bind the defendant vis-à-vis dissemination of the relevant information. [read post]
Currently, thirty-two states and territories have set a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am by Matthias Weller
The court’s answer to this question is in line with its decision in Wiemer & Trachte v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am by Liron Libman
” In noting Palestine’s status in the U.N., he perhaps signaled to the Palestinians how to move forward vis-a-vis obtaining the status of a state party before the ICC. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Part III will discern some of the most important implications of the status quo and discuss what is left of consumer protection in the arbitration context in the United States today. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Louisiana (No. 18-5924) Argument date 10/7: The question presented by the case is whether the XIV Amendment fully incorporates the VI Amendment guarantee to a unanimous verdict. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Jennifer McGrath
State Hemp Regulations The 2018 Farm Bill applies to all states and Indian tribes (as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Jennifer McGrath
State Hemp Regulations The 2018 Farm Bill applies to all states and Indian tribes (as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm by Jennifer McGrath
State Hemp Regulations The 2018 Farm Bill applies to all states and Indian tribes (as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States). [read post]