Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device" Results 81 - 100 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
  The court also entered pretrial preliminary injunctions against Samsung barring the sale of the Galaxy Nexus phone and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
  The court also entered pretrial preliminary injunctions against Samsung barring the sale of the Galaxy Nexus phone and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm by Ryan E. Long
For example, in a recent decision from United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:46 pm by Venkat
In addition, defendant created a universe of approximately 20 fictional online characters either related to or involved with Jesse, including an ex-wife, a son, various family members, a therapist, and friends living both in the United States and abroad. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:02 pm by Larry
United States sets right a very troubling scope decision from the Department of Commerce concerning helical spring lock washers ("HSLW") from China. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Over the next 10 days, more than 145 representatives of Member States of the United Nations will invest 60 hours in deliberations, aiming for consensus on most provisions. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Helferich sold a license to its patents “to what, at least at one time constituted most – we may assume all – of the manufacturers of mobile handsets for sale in the United States,” according to the Federal Circuit. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:01 am by Liskow & Lewis
 As stated above, the regulations explicitly state that area sources are exempt from Title V permitting requirements, unless otherwise required by law. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Jasmine Joseph
A version of that right is entrenched in the constitutional law of the United States: the right of every human being – again, without exception – not to be subjected to any punishment that is “cruel and unusual”. [read post]