Search for: "United States v. Vernon" Results 81 - 100 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDeportee's Sentence Vacatur Motion Denied; Claim Would Have Been Successive Habeas Petition United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Before O'Meara's resentencing, the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Blakely v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-1320. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:16 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   Recognition of a foreign country judgment under the Act “does not require that the procedures used in the courts of a foreign country be identical to those used in the courts of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Honorable Vernon Sykes and Honorable Roger Corbin (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the League of Women Voters of the United States (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, and Ohio (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the NAACP, Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior, and Mary Jordan… [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:37 pm by Todd Janzen
The United States Supreme Court will hear one Indiana farmer's claim that he is entitled to re-plant Roundup Ready (RR) soybeans that contain Monsanto's patented glyphosate resistant technology. [read post]