Search for: "United States v. Vinson" Results 81 - 100 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
   After saying that Congress has taxing power, the provision does say — without elaboration – that Congress also has the power “to provide for….the general welfare of the United States.” Congress customarily does not just hand out money to the states without strings attached. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
It asserts state tort claims against all the individual defendants, rather than against the United States, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Timothy Saviola, Nathan Swire
Vietnam hosted a U.S. aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson, in March. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am by Rachel Bercovitz
The United States previously deployed the so-called “mother of all bombs” against the Islamic State in the province two weeks ago. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:40 pm
On Jan. 6, a federal grand jury issued a superseding indictment in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:44 pm by Amy Howe
United States read like a “true crime” novel, involving robberies of drug dealers in the Midwest. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]