Search for: "United States v. Wurie"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
We’re still waiting to hear the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in two similar cases at the federal level: Riley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
California and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to issue landmark decisions early this summer regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a suspect's cell phone under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
California – police authority under Fourth Amendment to search a smartphone taken from an individual at the time of arrest United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:49 am
Wurie, 13-212. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
The second case the court will hear is United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:30 am
“Only the Supreme Court can finally resolve these issues, and I hope it will,” she wrote.In urging the Supreme Court to hear the case, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 3:13 pm
One reason may be that Riley has more representative facts but Wurie lets the United States play a larger role: As petitioner, DOJ can file a full length merits brief, a reply brief, and get 30 minutes of oral argument, instead of filing an amicus brief and getting the expected 10 minutes of the state’s oral argument time. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
It granted without limitation the government appeal in the other case: United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
And yes, the Court is indeed holding United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
