Search for: "Unknown Employee of the FBI" Results 81 - 100 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant, Chuck Rosenberg
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am by Jonathan Hafetz
In Rattigan, a jury found that the FBI violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by referring the plaintiff, a black FBI agent then employed in Saudi Arabia, for a security investigation in retaliation for the plaintiff’s filing an internal anti-discrimination complaint. [read post]
Starting in March 2016, the indictment alleges, a unit of Russia’s GRU military intelligence organization began sending emails to dozens of employees and volunteers in the Clinton campaign. [read post]
15 May 2018, 5:20 pm by Dan Goodin
FBI agents reportedly searched his Manhattan home a week after the WikiLeaks published its first Vault 7 dispatch in March 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 10:43 am by John Floyd
Lopez was also friendly with two of Calixto’s employees—a tow truck driver named Carlos Ortiz and a secretary named Myra Colon. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 1:29 pm by Emma Kohse
Whistleblower Protections for Contractors of the Intelligence Community Section 110 extends whistleblower protections to contractor employees in the intelligence community and of the FBI. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
In the past, CATF worked with and funded activities supporting Justice, INTERPOL-US National Central Bureau, FBI, and Homeland Security to battle antiquities trafficking.CATF met in June 2016 and again in June 2017. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:30 am by Daniel Byman
If right-wing and the smaller left-wing groups received similar attention as jihadists, the halls of the FBI and DHS would be bursting with new employees. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm by Bill Marler
More and better inspections by FDA and FSIS inspectors at various points in our food supply are absolutely necessary, as is good intelligence work by those at the CDC and FBI. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:00 am by Ben Wizner
This particular critique has always puzzled me: internal channels may be effective when a government employee stumbles on an incidence of fraud or abuse unknown to superiors, but it’s ludicrous to suggest that there is an internal channel for complaints that a system of mass surveillance – authorized by the president, approved by the FISA court, and briefed to Congress – has been deployed in secret without the consent of the governed. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:11 pm by Bill Marler
More and better inspections by FDA and FSIA inspectors at various points in our food supply are absolutely necessary, as is good intelligence work by those at the CDC and FBI. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
That employee may be: An accidental insider (e.g. an inattentive employee infiltrated due to inadvertent behaviors or broken business processes); A compromised insider (e.g. a targeted employee via social engineering and infiltrated due to malware infections or stolen credentials); or A malicious insider (e.g. a so-called bad leaver or criminal insider who infiltrate via corporate espionage and sabotage). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Collyer compels a number of unknown communications companies to comply with directives issued by the Attorney General and the DNI, presumably in assisting with surveillance. [read post]
After highlighting that the FBI’s targeting procedures, as well as the FBI and the NSA’s minimization procedures, were amended to accommodate this sharing, the court examined the NCTC minimization procedures. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am by Robert Chesney
Section 702 is coming up for renewal later this year, and it is clear we'll be hearing a lot in that context about the impact of SIGINT collection activities on US person communications. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Like RFRA, which was sold as this wholesome re-enactment of the preceding law (haha), this is another bill of goods being sold under the label “religious liberty” where even its drafters cannot fully explain its impact.The bottom line is that this order, which is more extreme than even RFRA, puts children to known and unknown risks. [read post]