Search for: "Unknown Owners or Claimants" Results 81 - 100 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 6:34 pm
The People of the State of New York have presented an abstract of title, and a certificate based thereon, which show that the decedent was the owner in fee simple of the said premises at the time of his death. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
A quiet title lawsuit also names unknown persons as defendants so that all conceivable claims against the property title can be removed and erased from the County records. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The Wall Street entities claimed to help (relatively) small business owners sell their businesses to larger companies. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:07 am by Attorney Daniel Krause
There are different rules that apply for known claimants and unknown future claimants. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am by Law Lady
RUSSELL, Respondent. 2nd District.Estates -- Claims -- Timeliness -- Claims filed beyond three-month creditors' claim period set forth in statute were time-barred, even assuming claimant was a known or reasonably ascertainable creditor who was not served with a copy of notice to creditors -- Where a personal representative has failed to serve a copy of notice to creditors on a known or reasonably ascertainable creditor, creditor's remedy is to petition probate court for an… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:02 am
”  The Court noted that the “rule is intended to preclude recovery for intangible and unknown damages for lost contract or economic opportunity. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
  There is an article about the case in the Herald Sun “Artist Demetrios Vakras must pay $350,000 after comparing gallery owner Robert Cripps to Adolf Hitler” and an article in the Age, “Gallery owner award $450,000 after being defamed by two artists”. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:33 am
Unknown to the trial judge and claimants, Harris had acquired the shares in Newzbin before the trial and became a director of it, creating an alter-ego, David Bahan, for those purposes. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
By the instant motion, the plaintiff moves for an order: (1) amending the captions of this action to reflect the proper name of answering defendant; 2) awarding summary judgment against the answering defendants; (2) fixing the defaults in answering of the non-answering defendants; (3) substituting one or more occupants found at the premises for unknowns named in the caption and deleting as party defendants the remaining unknown defendants; and (4) appointing a referee to compute… [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Peter Bert
Its key argument was that the unknown claimants were sufficiently looked after by the Augsburg Public Prosecution (Staatsanwaltschaft). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Let’s turn next to what the plaintiffs in these two cases object to covering in their employees’ health insurance plans.As I explained in my initial post, the heart of the plaintiffs’ claims in these two cases is that the HHS Rule will require the owners of the two companies to be complicit in (in Hobby Lobby’s words, to “participate in, provide access to, pay for, train others to engage in, or otherwise support”) the use of what they refer to as… [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
 This is in contrast to claims of co-ownership, which accrue only once, when “plain and express repudiation of co-ownership is communicated to the claimant. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:04 am by Larry Tolchinsky
If the names, residence or quantity of interest of any owner or claimant is unknown to plaintiff, this shall be stated. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:45 am by The Law Office of Stephen O'Rear, P.C.
Service by publication is authorized for use in actions against a defendant whose residence is unknown, against unknown heirs of a decedent, against stockholders of a defunct corporation, against unknown owners or claimants of interests in real property, or for delinquent ad valorem taxes. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:18 am
In short, Golden Eye and its fellow claimants were the owners of the copyright in a number of pornographic films which, they suspected, had been the subject of unauthorised peer-to-peer file-sharing by some 9,124 users of Telefonika's 02 internet services which infringed the copyright in those films. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:15 pm
Although the City is required to institute a civil forfeiture proceeding within 25 days after a "claimant" makes a formal demand for return of seized property that proceeding is commonly stayed until the conclusion of the underlying criminal action. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:32 am by Blue Blog
  It basically reverts to the old scheme where an unknown sub-subcontractor and virtually all suppliers have lien rights even if the owner or prime contractor does not know they are on the job. [read post]