Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Beginning at 2pm EST on Wednesday, October 14 (thanks, noLandGrab) the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Goldstein v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:10 pm
Alave v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today issued a revised decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:05 am
41–60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 185; [2011] WLR (D) 62 “The meaning of the words ‘a self-contained … part of a building’ in section 3 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was clear and there was nothing in the section to suggest that the right to enfranchisement attached only to the smallest possible self-contained part of a building. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:26 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:22 am
Urban, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Brianna L. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 9:25 pm
Ousley v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 11:18 am
Montgomery Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, has written to newly confirmed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Director Rohit Chopra, asking him to review companies in the tenant screening industry for possible Fair Credit Reporting Act violations and other violations of U.S. laws. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
Parker - Urban Renewal and the Story of Berman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:37 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:07 am
Turns out NAVAJO is a registered trademark. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:33 pm
ET, we will be live blogging the oral arguments in Kaur v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:19 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (D. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
Appellants sought judicial review in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, alleging that the development plan did not comply with the applicable county zoning ordinance and urban design guidelines. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 10:26 pm
Loncorich v McLeod County Board of Commissioners, 868 N.W. 2d 755 (MN App. 8/17/2015) Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw Tagged: CAFOs [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 1:13 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:47 pm
City Square of the Fordham Urban Law Journal features a give-and-take between Professors Victor Romero (Penn State) and Won Kidane (Seattle) about Professor Romero's article Decriminalizing Border Crossings, 38 Fordham Urb. [read post]
