Search for: "Van Order v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
Concurrence: One of these days we should resolve what, if anything, is left of Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Christophe Geiger: different EU/US traditions around regulatory oversight/verification of compliance with key values v private ordering. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
If the answer to question 1 is yes or the answer to question 2 is no, which criteria are to be applied in order to determine whether or not the composition or internal structure of the product could be analysed and reproduced without undue burden within the meaning of opinion G 1/92? [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Under an absolutely bananas municipal policy, Granite City, Ill. officials order compulsory eviction of private tenants because their adult daughter, who had visited their home briefly, was later arrested for stealing a van. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Consequently, the creators of the new system decided to place the “EU patent law” outside of the EU legal order. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:47 am by Ekaterina Pannebakker
Saarloos, Arbitrage en de effectiviteit van de EEX-Verordening naar aanleiding van de schipbreuk van de Prestige in 2002. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Registration Sys., Inc. v McVicar, 203 AD3d 919 [2d Dept 2022]). [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am by Michael Oykhman
“Converts” If the item is not actually taken, the Criminal Code in section 322(1) also states that “everyone commits theft who fraudulently […] converts to his use or to the use of another person, anything…”. [read post]