Search for: "Velasquez v. Velasquez" Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by Brian Shiffrin
James, 132 A.D.2d 932, 933 ), the Court of Appeals has restricted the use of reconstruction hearings to establish a record (People v Velasquez, 1 NY3d 44 [2003] ["Reconstruction hearings may be appropriate where it is clear that a proceeding took place that was not transcribed ( see e.g. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/08/08-99035.pdf Bills v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Velasquez, 692 NE 2d 841 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1998 After a divorce with a complete and comprehensive division of assets and debts…what else could a couple go back to court for? [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Palencia v Perez, 2019 WL 1907867 (11th Cir., 2019) the district court concluded that Marilys Velasquez Perez had wrongfully retained her son, H.J.D.V., in the United States and away from Guatemala, his place of habitual residence. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"To establish a cause of action alleging legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship" (Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 913; see Terio v Spodek, 63 AD3d 719, 721; Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:49 pm by José Guillermo
El actual gobernante, un gran pendejo, tiene miedo precisamente porqué es consiente de sus felonías, traiciones, pactos bajo la mesa que el trata de presentar como “sobre” la mesa y por ello se aferra al cargo y ha tenido la osadía de pedir la reconciliación nacional secundado por un criminal recién liberado vía indulto, pidiendo “un Perú sin rencores”. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011), summarizes general Texas immunity law: Under Texas law, a suit against a government employee in his official capacity is a suit against his government employer with one exception: an action alleging that the employee acted ultra vires. [read post]