Search for: "Velazquez v Velazquez" Results 81 - 97 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:38 am by Renee Newman Knake
Velazquez and legal advice and advocacy as protected speech; how Citizens United intersects with NAACP v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Velazquez, the trial court’s advisement is going to absolve the failure of the attorney to do that. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 8:43 am
And let's not forget the shameful Supreme Court decisions Evans v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
The court would not, however, completely invalidate the withdrawal letters, instead ruling that it would not compound the injury by essentially forcing plaintiffs to rejoin through automatically invalidating their withdrawal without their consent (Velazquez v FPS LC dba Office Furniture Connection, August 4, 2014, Harmon, M). [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Giving a male general manager a chance to put before a jury his claim that he was terminated based on lobbying by a female human resources employee whose romantic and sexual advances he had repeatedly rebuffed, the appeals court vacated in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer (Velazquez-Perez v Developers Diversified Realty Corp, May 23, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
Rafael Velazquez Perez and I have posted the draft of an essay, which we first presented at the Associativity of the Study of the Cuban Economic January 2021 Conference. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]