Search for: "Vines v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 3:30 am
See Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:25 pm
The Master made it clear that the Second Defendant’s attempt to introduce “a number of matters relating to the Claimant’s general reputation and attacks being or to be made upon him and questions to be levelled at him by his political opponents and others interested”, remarking that “While a general poor reputation may be relevant to mitigate damages, instances of specific misconduct (even were they alleged, and I do not think that they are, or proved, and which they… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:09 pm
Pathogen-commodity pairs responsible for the most outbreak-related cases were Clostridium perfringens in poultry (902 cases), Salmonella in fruits/nuts (776 cases), norovirus in leafy vegetables (657 cases), STEC in leafy vegetables (398 cases), Salmonella in vine-stalk vegetables (331 cases), and V. parahaemolyticus in mollusks (223 cases). [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast in which they discussed recent national security law news and debates: Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
" This is why FAPL is developing "technologies like gif crawlers, Vine crawlers, working with Twitter to look to curtail this kind of activity", also because "Twitter respects the intellectual property rights of others and expects users of the Services to do the same. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
A summary of the schedule is below.SYMPOSIUM SCHEDULEBREAKFAST, REGISTRATION, AND OPENING REMARKS: 8:00AM – 8:40AMBreakfast, registration, and opening remarks will occur before the start of the symposium.PANEL I: 8:40AM – 9:40AMProtecting Your Client's Image: The Use of Intellectual Property Law to Represent a Client's Business and Personal InterestsPANEL II: 9:50AM – 10:50AMLeveraging Social Media: Best Social Media Practices for the Entertainment and Sports… [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
Barron v Vines [2016] EWHC 1226 (QB) (Warby J) – damages were assessed in the sum of £40,000 for each claimant. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 5:52 am
(available online with subscription at: https://www.sfchronicle.com/food/wine/article/napa-valley-california-winery-17667357.php) 2Terlato Wine Grp., Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
It is intended to fix the problems created by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Vine v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Yes, it’s time to roll out Nix v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
Image via WikipediaIn Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 5:57 am
In the Matter of Dep’t. of Enforcement v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:47 pm
The aspects of an invention that may have led the Patent and Trademark Office to issue a patent were not per se coterminous with the features of the patented product that may lead consumers to select that product over other similar ones, the court concluded.The decision is Delano Farms Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:04 pm
Vines. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On Thursday 20 July 2023 there will be a statement in open court in the case of Vine -v- Belfield. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:23 pm
That bill died on the vine. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:14 am
Innvopak had argued that the marks were dissimilar, stating that the WINEBUD mark was a play on vinebud or the bud of a vine and was therefore different in commercial impression than BUD. [read post]
