Search for: "Virgin v. Virgin" Results 81 - 100 of 1,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
It sounds tranquil, but she was in the midst of reading a beast of a judgment from Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in the ongoing Virgin Atlantic saga in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] EWCA Civ 1713. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
Inerstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991)].Edwards v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:34 am by Tom Bolt
The appellants in the recently decided case, Vento v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:47 pm
We've followed and written about this one for over two years: Virgin Records America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Thanks to Charles Lee Mudd law offices for hosting the special verdict form in Virgin v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Starnes appeal from judgments of conviction and sentence entered against them following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:45 pm by Aviation LawProf
.'s Delta Airlines and Australia's Virgin Blue, V Australia, and Pacific Blue (which also has operations in New... [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:29 am
To recap briefly, on Wednesday 21 January, in a mammoth judgment of some 344 paragraphs, Mr Justice Lewison ruled that Virgin Atlantic's Upper Class seat patent was valid but not infringed, and that its design rights weren't infringed either (Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group Ltd and Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 26 (Pat), here).Right: not as comfy as the seat in question, but much more fun for air travellersThis… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:41 am
The ruling, in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group Ltd and Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 26 (Pat) can be read in full here. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 2:44 pm
  In the case of Chang v Virgin Mobile USA, LLC, 2009 WL 111570 (N.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm by Steven Cohen
 The defendants filed a motion to exclude, which was denied Facts – This case (Bernstein v. [read post]