Search for: "Virtus Investments, Ltd." Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  According to the complaint, GPH invests heavily in the exploitation of its technologies and patents, including the asserted patents, through its extensive licensing activities. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Regarding domestic industry, Beacon states that a domestic industry exists by virtue of a significant investment in plant and equipment, a significant investment in labor and capital, and a substantial investment in the exploitation of the asserted patents, including engineering and research and development. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Lastly, the complaint states that Renesas once asserted a patent related to the ‘432 patent against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:08 pm by Alex Gasser
  According to the complaint, a domestic industry exists under Subpart (C) of Section 337(a)(3) by virtue of Trek’s substantial investment in the exploitation of the asserted patents. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi v The Security Service heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office v Tariq, heard 24 – 27 January 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v… [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The appellant was a small investor who had purchased 100 equity shares of Reliance Industries Ltd through a broker. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Regarding domestic industry, Rambus asserts that it “has made a substantial investment in the exploitation of the Asserted Patents by virtue of its substantial engineering, research and development, licensing, and technical service activities within the United States relating to technology protected by the relevant claims of these patents. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:03 pm by Michael Geist
  Leading international publishers such as McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Nelson Education Ltd., Simon & Schuster Canada, and Oxford University Press all support opening up all aspects of the Canadian market. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm by admin
This means the company has to show it is financially unviable to take up the green project in the absence of western investment. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:56 am by Simon Lester
Let me first turn to Luke Peterson of the Investment Arbitration Reporter for some background: The individual claimants, Jerry Montour, Jerry Hill, and Arthur Montour Jr., profess to be members of Native American (indigenous) tribes and seek at least $175 Million (US) for losses alleged to have been sustained by themselves and their Canadian enterprise, Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, LTD. ... [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:57 pm by Durga Rao
A constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Associated Cement Companies Ltd. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:31 pm
In substance, Arnold J said no [the IPKat says, this is consonant with the position recently taken by the General Court with regard to appeals against successful rulings in invalidity proceedings in Case T-300/08 Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Tresplain Investments Ltd]. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am by shirley
However, ultimately in the matter of Cape Pacific Ltd v Lubner Controlling Investments (Pty) Ltd [1995] ZASCA 53 (also 1995 4 SA 790 (A)) the Appellate Division laid down that each inquiry as to whether or not the corporate veil should be lifted necessitates an enquiry into the facts, with emphasis being placed on the substance rather than the form of any corporate action taken. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:56 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
We all know about the dispute resolution mechanism under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956. [read post]