Search for: "WALKER v. JACOBS"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 7:19 am
The Second Circuit (Jacobs, Walker and Leval) recognizes the need for quick and specific objections:This case illustrates the critical need for timely objection. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
"The case is Weintraub v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:19 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Walker and Leval) reverses. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
This analysis misunderstands the case, the Second Circuit (Walker, Jacobs and Leval) says. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
(Alabama), Clive Walker (Leeds, England), Russell L. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
Judge Jacobs disagreed. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
The case was People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
The opinion of their Lordships is contained in the speech of Lord Hoffmann, to whose words Lord Walker of Gestinthorpe could add nothing useful. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
No this isn't IPKatSee Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) and in particular the glorious write up here.Food gets a 0% VAT rate. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) (Warren J) (Thanks to the Legal Post for highlighting this case). [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 14, 2008 Walker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
October 2, 2007) (Jacobs, Walker, Calabresi, CJJ)Waline Brutus testified at her drug importation trial. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
Julie Moore Walker, et al. v. [read post]
