Search for: "WASHINGTON v. ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm
Accordingly, the Court directed the State to take down the banners and prohibited the public placement of any additional banners containing personal data of individuals without authority of law.United StatesCitizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The SCA generally prohibits disclosure to federal or state governments of certain email messages and metadata, but this prohibition yields to U.S. court orders that meet the following criteria: “A court order for disclosure . . . shall issue only if the governmental entity [seeking the order] offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the contents of a wire or electronic communication, or the records or other… [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
Meanwhile, we learned that the advocacy group Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court regarding the Verizon FISA order leaked by Edward Snowden. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
This Round up was complied by Suneet Sharma a junior legal professional with a particular interest and experience in media, information and privacy law. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) reported recently that in 2016 the government filed 1,485 applications for FISA surveillance, either electronic surveillance or physical searches. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm
’s endorsement for “electronic data liability”). [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Center for Social Change, Inc. et al v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Special Backgrounder Compilation of Selected Stories Legal Hold and Preservation at Center of Apple/Samsung Battle - http://bit.ly/OXA172 (Jim McGann) Samsung, Apple Spar Over Gadgets' Specs | Reuters - http://reut.rs/OKmFvC (Dan Levine, Edwin Chin) Australian Patent Dispute: Apple v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
As The Washington Post reported on August 6, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a California district court decision in the case of Bunnell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
No difference between Gmail and non-Gmail users—they don’t have lower preferences for privacy and they aren’t better informed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Report is the product of a bid for transparency and accountability in the intelligence sharing practices across 42 jurisidctions although, perhaps to be expected, the information disclosed to Privacy International is limited. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Courts in western states such as Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah, and Washington have preempted “confidential information” theft claims under their respective trade secret preemption statutes. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:20 am
Even before that disclosure, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and 14 other consumer groups complained to the Federal Trade Commission that Facebook was engaging in unfair trade practices. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
The Center for Internet and Society has made a submission to the Indian Government on the Draft IT Intermediaries Guidelines. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm
Washington Post, 386 F.3d 567, 575 (4th Cir. 2004)). [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
The Institute called on the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office to provide more detailed information about warrants seeking journalists’ digital data and information that could identify their sources. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm
Š. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
