Search for: "WATKINS v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
This post is based on a Latham & Watkins M&A Commentary by Mr. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:39 am
Heiden, partner in the Chicago office of Latham & Watkins, to dissect Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
Joe Watkins, Applicant v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm
At Forbes, Peter Reilly examines the consequences of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A thousand thanks to the IPKat's friends at the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP for hosting this year's IP Publishers and Editors Lunch on behalf of this weblog. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:30 am
While most in England are debating whether it should be Ivan Toney or Ollie Watkins as first-choice deputy for Harry Kane, in the employment law world we have been focusing on the strikers at the heart of an important new Supreme Court decision in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:12 am
This post is based on a Latham & Watkins Corporate Governance Commentary by Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866 (29 July 2008) Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 883 (29 July 2008) Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors (”Bainbridge 1″) [2008] EWCA Civ 885 (29 July 2008) G, R (on the application… [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm
Post, The Courts on Climate Change and Fundamental Rights Arnon Gutfeld, Cantwell v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
”); see also Watkins v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
When Watkins yelled for [Clark] to stop, [he] fled on foot. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
Watkins v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 am
Judge Watkins ruled, in reliance on the O’Melveny decision, that state law governed the imputation question. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:07 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Watkins v. [read post]
