Search for: "WH v. State"
Results 81 - 94
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2009, 2:14 pm
See Cintas Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
In an internal memo obtained by Above the Law, the firm acknowledges that "a very small number of individuals" have been asked to leave WH for economic reasons. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
N.Y. 1998) 7 F.Supp.2d 303, 4 WH Cases 2d 1207 in which she granted conditional class certification and the sending of a class notice in an FLSA collective action. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Ark Restaurants, 7 FSupp2d 303, 4 WH Cases 2d 1207 (5/19/98). [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:54 pm
AT&T and Jewel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:05 pm
In conclusion, if Obama is going to accomplish the stated goal of eliminating the wasteful spending he needs to start where the health care buck stops - in the stakeholders' corporate pockets. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:49 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:13 am
Built like a tank - almost three pounds v. the usual featherweight disposable pieces of junk bundled with most PCs today. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 10:43 am
McDougal v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
