Search for: "WHITE v. MADISON"
Results 81 - 100
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See, Marbury v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:59 pm
The Federalist No. 40 (James Madison). [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
Madison was emphatic in The Federalist Papers that neither House could impose additional qualifications, and the Supreme Court so held unanimously in Powell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 9:28 am
Remini, Robert V. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
A nice mix, if I do say so myself, especially given the argument we are making; thanks to all of them for joining, to UCLA law student Madison Way for her help with the brief, and, as always, to Scott & Cyan Banister, whose support makes our UCLA Amicus Brief Clinic possible. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 10:37 pm
(Marbury v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
It has sprung instead from the dominant fears of white political leaders in the South, ardent segregationists and white supremacists who wanted to minimize the impact of black voting and political influence. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:51 pm
Madison) (Jacob E. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Liberal scholars pronounced John Bingham the second coming of James Madison, celebrated the post-Civil War amendments as a Second Constitutional Founding/Revolution, and documented that the privileges and immunities clause was intended to incorporate the Bill of Rights. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
I read Madison as offering the quite implausible hope that the new Constitution can endure as a “republican” order, basically by limiting the power of “we the people”; he proudly states in Federalist 63 that a central feature of the new constitutional order is that all governance will be done exclusively through “representatives” and none whatsoever by “the people” themselves. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Madison (1803), McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Madison (1803), McCulloch v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
Professor Nicoletti tells us that the American Supreme Court would never reverse its Texas v, White decision which had ruled that there was no right to secession. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
White, but that hasn’t kept ex-Confederates, New Afrikans, contemporary white nationalists, or proponents of #CalExit from continuing to dream of self-liberation. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
