Search for: "WHITE v. SALING" Results 81 - 100 of 1,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
   Now out from behind a paywall: Law & Laundry: White Laundresses, Chinese Laundrymen, and the Origins of Muller v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Shalimar: white guy from France who never visited India creates a fragrance inspired by an Indian ruler who loved his wife. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Plaintiffs: We were arrested for violating the curfew, but all we were doing was peacefully protesting outside the White House. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
  The amendment was only published the week before and was not subjected to any consultation, white paper or select committee report. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Notes to Geldon: Washington is not the Great White Way; neither Geldon nor Sen. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm by Josh Blackman
And, to be precise, there were natives in present-day Ohio before there were white settlers. [read post]