Search for: "WILDER v. UNITED STATES" Results 81 - 100 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Mel Kramer
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:52 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Perry and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
DIFFUSION AN INTERNATIONAL, INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE LAW       Co-Sponsored by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law and Juris Diversitas 3 & 4 June 2013 Lausanne, Switzerland  [For additional information, contact Marie Papeil at marie.papeil@isdc-dfjp.unil.ch ] Monday, June 3, 2013 8:30-9:30              Registration, Coffee … [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by Daniel Richardson
  The trial court ordered all of the equipment off the road and found that the denial of the request to repair and remove by the Town constituted discriminatory treatment and violated Petitioner’s constitutional rights to equal protection under both the United States and Vermont Constitutions. [read post]