Search for: "WOODS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 81 - 100
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
After Justice Thomas announced his opinion in United Student Aid Funds yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:31 pm
With Steyn J stating that the appeal has a “real prospect of success”, it appears that Cadwalladr is not out of the woods yet. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
The other Justices released statements praising their departing colleague, and a number of Stevens clerks recorded their memories of the Justice on the op-ed pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post (here and here). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:09 am
Supreme Court's decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
So the Biden Administration is not out of the woods yet. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 2:21 pm
Is this an agency, a department, a legal entity of some kind that can bring a suit with Chief Justice Kaye? [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barrett’s willingness to look past possible abuse of discretion and violation of due process decried by the dissenting judges echoes Chief Justice John Roberts’s deferential reasoning in Trump v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:46 am
Here's an excerpt from the Introduction to the article: Justice Breyer must either (a) grapple with the artificial question of what would constitute a judicial taking if there were such a thing as a judicial taking (reminiscent of the perplexing question how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?) [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Class v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
In 1993, Garland was appointed as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
" Based on that, here's my quick analysis of Justice Wood's decision: [1.] [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
STRAHAN v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Although in the years before Chief Justice John Marshall the federal judiciary was described in Federalist No. 78 as “beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power,” this characterization is much more debatable at the present. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
Andrew Keane Woods summarized the key issues to watch as the justices debate U.S. government access to communications data stored abroad. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
What the Chief Justice explained in the landmark Health-Care Cases (a/k/a NFIB v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
Susan questioned whether the Department of Justice was rethinking material support laws and domestic terrorism. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
The Department of Justice is considering an appeal to the Supreme Court after the 9th Circuit handed down a ruling yesterday in al-Kidd v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
 Woods’s lawyers had argued that he could not be executed because his low I.Q. [read post]
