Search for: "Wand v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent… [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A theory of collaborative constitutionalism is not a magic wand—no theory is. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm by Tiana Garbett and James Gatto
Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship (Thaler v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
  The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by Chris Castle
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
” But the counter-measures doctrine is not a magic wand; the doctrine involves requirements that can, in practice, be difficult to fulfil. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 9:06 pm by Cary Coglianese
In the 2024 case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]