Search for: "Warner v. Harris"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
The Lexicon proved to be such a good resource that it was reputedly used by Warner Bros in their Harry Potter productions. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:33 pm
The opinion in the Warner Brothers Entertainment & JK Rowling v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:30 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
So, for example, if I review the new Harry Potter movie, I can use the trademark "Harry Potter" in my review without fear of liability because it is both descriptive of the source of the film (the Harry Potter franchise co-owned by Warner Brothers and J.K. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:04 pm
" Ty Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Rowling and Warner Bros. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:57 pm
Rowling testified this week in her lawsuit against the publisher of a book version of The Harry Potter Lexicon, Warner Bros. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:00 pm
Rowling v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
– Warner Music buys share of Imeem.com file-sharing site: (Against Monopoly),How IP.com supports copyrights: (Securing Innovation),Sharing, part of the power of everybody: (Copyfight)Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralIntricacies of choosing a pharmaceutical trade mark: (International Law Office),Commercial success v public interest: publicising clinical trial data: (Spicy IP),Big Pharma and neglected diseases: (Spicy IP),India: MNCs and patent… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:24 pm
Rowling v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
Warner Bros., which owns the film rights to the Harry Potter books, and Harry Potter author J.K. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:40 am
Rowling and Warner Brothers are suing Steven Van Ark and his publisher over the Harry Potter Lexicon, a book based on Mr. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The administration is supporting the manufacturer in that case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
