Search for: "Washington v. Trade Winds" Results 81 - 100 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
v=mHV4nDS501Y -- afforded reason enough to suspect something along these lines even before the latest Republican volte face on the individual mandate. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:14 am by Mischa Popoff
” Book sits in a chair that was once occupied by none other than Miles V. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
  It is also the case that, as a result of FISA and other things, Article III judges can receive highly sensitive classified information ex parte; in Washington, DC, the infrastructure for doing this already exists. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Simply stated, what motivates much public interest regulation is a simple desire by some here in Washington to tell the American people what’s best for them. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Agency for International Development v. [read post]
Instead, we write to express our unanimous view the SEC has clear statutory authority to mandate additional climate-related disclosures for publicly traded companies. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am by Berin Szoka
It’s no less clear why we’ll wind up marching down that path, no matter what the current FCC leadership intends. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
I use the word ‘trade’ with some degree of care. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Larry Downes
  The story has been widely reported, including posts from The Washington Post, CNET, Computerworld, and The Hill. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]