Search for: "Watkins v. Hand"
Results 81 - 100
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:07 pm
Torcaso v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Baze v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:35 am
" Watkins Products v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:18 pm
There's that "v" word again. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
About 70 years later, SCOTUS moved away from this theistic definition in Torcaso v Watkins where it held that the Establishment Clause prohibits government from ‘aid[ing] those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs’. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
He also identifies a related function—Congress’s “informing function”—which was recognized by the Supreme Court in Watkins v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
More on the 1963 Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:02 pm
In McCormick’s case, it sought dismissal of Watkin’s complaint on the theory (among others) that a container’s size is not “commercial advertising and promotion” because no words are involved”, citing Farah v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
The IP Watchdog continues to wring its hands over the newly-expanded prior commercial use defense under the America Invents Act. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
Potter, Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
On 21 June 2018, Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the same case [2018] EWHC 1570 (QB) (heard 20 April 2018) – dismissing an application for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
ON 23 March 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of United the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB). [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 1, 2009)(per curiam)(statutory construction; does hand-written copy qualify as a copy required by the prison inmate litigation statute?) [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 am
Watkins (1874) and Cow v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
This week, a federal judge will begin handing down sentences for nine members of the Oath Keepers paramilitary group for their roles in the Jan. 6 insurrection, including six convicted of seditious conspiracy. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:40 am
Watkins et al. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
So I was tempted to figure that Rule 3.3(a)(2) was a dead letter, until I came across the decision by US District Court here in Watkins v. [read post]
