Search for: "Weekes v. Parker"
Results 81 - 100
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2021, 7:22 pm
Recall that the original SSDI eligibility ban was poorly drafted, see D12-05, and the Commission held in Gary Kluczynski, UI Hearing No. 14400214AP (30 May 2014) that this original ban on receiving unemployment benefits only applied to the week in which SSDI [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
” Weeks later, Minnesota Gov. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Last week saw the Committee’s third, public meeting. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 3:36 pm
I was prompted by a judgment published last week to write about redaction errors. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
Parker, Attorneys for Appellant Dustin D. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[7] A week later, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote a concurring opinion in Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[7] A week later, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote a concurring opinion in Bush v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:07 pm
Last week, the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 9:12 am
And actually the case at that time was called Lynch v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
Bartenfelder v Bartenfelder, Nos. 0934, 2052 [Ct. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 11:41 am
One such case was the 2018 case Stevens v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
Though Parker had been unable to make bail, McDowell had given Parker a bail-like release (something that a jailer was apparently allowed to do), but then threatened to revoke it if Parker voted for a candidate of whom McDowell disapproved. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
EPA Assistant Administrator Susan Parker Bodine explained that the timing of the reversal stems from the lifting of coronavirus social distancing restrictions. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Medicaid After-Hours Claims Audits (CPT Code 99050 / CPT Code 99051) by State Medicaid Regulators are Continuing. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Alabama Although not as recent as the cases currently being pursued in Texas and New Jersey, it is worth noting that a Federal case out of the Northern District of Alabama held that a healthcare provider had improperly used the after-hours billing code for weekend visits when the clinic’s normal business hours, as advertised on the clinic’s website and written to all insurance companies, were 7 days a week from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.[10] South Carolina Th [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Delaware’s Weird—and Constitutionally Suspect—Approach to Judicial Independence By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps discusses an upcoming Supreme Court case, Carney v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
For IRFs, the provision waives the requirement that a patient receive at least 15 hours of therapy per week. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020): On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
