Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 81 - 100 of 12,203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm by Anna E. Bullock
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Indeed, in most states (say, Alabama), I'm very confident that the state supreme court would literally laugh out loud at the mere mention of any such claim.So in that way, California is, I suspect, no outlier.But here's where we're different.First, there's a dissent. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm by Thomas James
Both input (training) and output (derivative works) claims are alleged, as well as state law claims of unfair competition, etc. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Instead, a court (often a California state court or the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[2] – ‘Stable Diffusion Frivolous’ (website created by tech enthusiasts defending AI image generators) On January 13, 2023, three visual artists filed a putative class action suit against three AI companies in the Northern District of California, on behalf of themselves and other artists. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
For that event, the Founders provided a built-in vehicle by which the Constitution could be amended, but a single state, no matter how well intended, may not do so, and neither can this court. [read post]