Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 81 - 100 of 109,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 And, if presented with a poorly-performing substitute, well, all the worse for the fiduciaries, as the employees are “strongly motivated to seek legal redress. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm by Kevin
Were you in the federal courthouse in Philadelphia on Tuesday and did you manage to get a picture of the attorney who reportedly wore a Grover head during opening statements in Burns v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:51 pm by Duana Boswell-Loechel
Placing the child in conditions or surroundings that endanger their physical or emotional well-being. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:20 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
It’s important to note, as per Illinois choice of law rules, that the pre-suit demand requirement is governed by the law of Delaware in the case of corporations incorporated there (Wells v. [read post]
  The court reasoned that national security considerations are plainly of the highest importance to be taken into account, lending support in Secretary for Justice v Timothy Wynn Owen KC. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
Furthermore, the Romanian procedure cannot be considered compatible with EU law, as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights X. and Y. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Berkeley Dean Erwin Chemerinsky—who is also a noted scholar of constitutional law and academic freedom—joins Jane Bambauer and me to discuss student speech controversies (including the one that was literally in Erwin's back yard), as well as faculty academic freedom in scholarship, public commentary, and teaching.The post Free Speech Unmuted: Campus Speech, with Dean Erwin Chemerinsky (Berkeley Law) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
For these reasons, along with the availability of less restrictive measures, TikTok asserts the law fails intermediate scrutiny as well. [read post]