Search for: "Wells Anderson"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
, Anderson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Anderson, the Section Three case pending before the Supreme Court, it is important that there has been a full five-day trial of the facts in the Colorado courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
" Our fears were well founded. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
I’m working now on the final of my substantive posts (Part Eight), about the First Amendment “off-ramp” argument that might well be the strongest such argument (though it’s received the least attention from the parties). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
These drafts pose substantial risks to global cybersecurity and significantly impact the rights and activities of good faith cybersecurity researchers.Our community, which includes good faith security researchers in academia and cybersecurity companies, as well as those working independently, plays a critical role in safeguarding information technology systems. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
" Outside of certain exercises of power to exclude, expel, or impeach and try, committed to each House's judgment, Section Three is enforceable by the judiciary as well as by other officials. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:29 am
“Creating robust opportunities for competition teams is a key component of our program,” said Dean Jerry Anderson. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
[Note: This is the sixth in a series of essays responding to objections that have been made to enforcing Section Three of the Constitution. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 11:32 am
Later Thursday, the Court will post the official audio of the arguments as well as an official transcript. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
While not a dismissal, a well-negotiated plea bargain can significantly reduce the impact of domestic violence charges on your life. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
Kirk Anderson, as a seasoned Minneapolis criminal defense lawyer, is well-versed in the intricacies of the expungement process. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
Anderson asserts (pp. 38-40) that Section Three can only be enforced following a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm
Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” Like the Colorado Supreme Court, I don’t think that “insurrection” was well-defined when the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted or that there’s any sure-fire way to define it now that would clearly distinguish it from rebellion, on the one hand, and politically motivated violence short of insurrection, including riots, on the other. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Anderson have pivoted to a new strategy. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump concedes, as he must (Br. at 24-25), that the President is an “officer” for purposes of the Constitution.[1] After all, the Constitution refers to the President’s “office” or to the “Office of the President” almost two dozen times.[2] He insists, however, that the qualifying phrase “of the United States” in Section 3 serves to exclude the President, as well as the Vice-President, Senators and House… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Barbara Lauriat, Borrowing Goodwill Comparative/historical approach to doctrine/theory. [read post]
