Search for: "Wells v. McKenzie" Results 81 - 100 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 4:17 am
[Article 2.2 of the Services Directive expressly excludes a number of services from its scope, including "(d) services in the field of transport, including port services, falling within the scope of Title V of the Treaty". [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
It is now well established in UK law that people who are the subject of a police investigation have a right to privacy until they are charged with a criminal offence. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm by Anna Christensen
*Note: Thanks to my colleague, Troy McKenzie, a former law clerk to Justice Stevens, for helpful comments on a draft. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Mckenzie Ripoff Report May Be “Appalling,” But It Still Gets 47 USC 230 Immunity–Giordano v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:24 pm by familoo
Well yes, but this should be happening anyway (see K v K wherein the Court of Appeal said ‘Woah, woah, woah – that’s not quite what we meant in H-N. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Ms Haigh’s McKenzie friend (Elizabeth Watson) was jailed for these actions, which had amounted to a contempt of court because they breached reporting restrictions (she was later released early because she purged her contempt by apologising and doing her best to make amends). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am by INFORRM
  The European Court of Human Rights held in the well known case of Tolstoy v United Kingdom ((1995) 20 EHRR 442). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Speakers are Ben Allgrove (Baker & McKenzie), Alice Gould (Wedlake Bell), Annsley the AmeriKat (Collyer Bristow) and Mark Engelman (Hardwicke), with IPKat team blogger Jeremy in the chair. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm by Eilionoir Flynn
The Court may well turn once more to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for guidance in interpreting Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as it did in the case of Glor v Switzerland. [read post]