Search for: "Wells v. McKenzie"
Results 81 - 100
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
A SIXTEEN YEAR BATTLE in Scotland’s courts between a struggling pensioner, Andrew McNamara and the might & influence of Edinburgh law firm Tods Murray, may well have been considerably shortened if reforms implemented only a few days ago in Scotland’s courts, granting McKenzie Friends a right of audience had come much earlier, reports Catherine Simpson in the Herald newspaper. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
As Lord Justice Clark, Lord Gill chaired a review commission that recommended McKenzie friends be granted rights of audience in the courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
I explained that I wanted to write a follow up post setting out what the Freedom of Information Act requests appeared to show, and making clear I wanted to write a well informed and fair piece on what had happened. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
By Eric Goldman Karnaby v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) (glass in piece of cake); McKenzie v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
With the new year well under way and showing some early promise of demonstrations of the dark side of the human condition, I thought I would start Rive Gauche this week with a story picked up by RollonFriday.com…. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) and McKenzie v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
The opinion then cited AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
The European Court of Human Rights held in the well known case of Tolstoy v United Kingdom ((1995) 20 EHRR 442). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
" Focusing as well on personal-private v public use in various copyright and related statues, we find a similar form of exception for certain defined activities with respect to a copyright work, which are for "private and/or personal" use. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
” Well, add another to that list. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:31 am
In Perkins v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:05 pm
Trying to say McKenzie and Kubinsky in the span of a few minutes didn’t turn out so well. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
Watson’s McKenzie Friend in these proceedings) lives, I am told, in Germany although she has a flat in London. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Wilkof are, well, more or less the same today as they were last week ... [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
See AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:35 am
See Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
