Search for: "Whalen v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm
Whalen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:13 pm
Schulz and State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:40 am
State Board for Professional Medical Conduct
APPELLATE TERMFamily Law
Transgendered Petitioner Is Granted Reversal Of Prior Court Order Denying Name Change
Matter of Winn-Ritzenberg
NEW YORK COUNTYTorts
Motorist Raises Triable Issue of Whether Readily Observable Manifestation of Decay in Tree Existed
Whalen v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 5:21 am
" Whalen v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Whalen: An Illustration These issues played out in People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:03 am
In Whalen v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:20 am
End Note: The two cases referenced at the start are Whalen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Pulka v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
" [Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, emphasis supplied].In other words, when faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either provide the record sought, deny the request and indicate the specific exemption to disclosure it is relying upon justifying such refusal, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:35 pm
” The court on November 7 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am
Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s April 24 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:46 am
(Forthcoming)., Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1492 The Role of Dissents in the Formation of Precedent 14 DUKE JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & PUBLIC POLICY 285 (2019), Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1493 Allocating Authority between Lawyers and Their Clients after McCoy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
For an earlier federal district court motion pointing out such hallucinated citations in another case, which I hadn't seen mentioned anywhere before and which I just learned about Friday, see Whalen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
According to the Supreme Court’s decision in Whalen v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
In Banton v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
Such question presumptively violated a constitutional right to privacy discussed by the Supreme Court in Whalen v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
King with nary a mention of Whalen and Cinque or even acknowledging the prior split of authority. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Pulka v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm
It recalled the extensive commentary by Justice Kennedy, in the Court’s last same-sex marriage decision (United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am
Nelson, 562 U.S. 134 (2009), Whalen v. [read post]