Search for: "Whittle v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Opposer also introduced empirical evidence that a substantial portion of the United States is aware of the SPOTIFY mark. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
The process of whittling away the scope of immunity available to protect the participants in judicial processes appears to be far from over. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
United States: two second-degree murder convictions overturned after three days of police questioning in the absence of counsel. 1944 Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
Edward Ryan, an attorney for the United States, then informs Judge Pohl that he is prepared to respond, but asks for a moment with the Chief Prosecutor and co-trial counselor. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:56 pm
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, No. 11-2438 (7th Cir. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 4:34 am
Consequently, due process protections under the Michigan and United States Constitutions … are operative. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes extolled the idea that freedom of speech in the First Amendment is based upon a marketplace of ideas. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
See Handschu v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:17 am
Sawyer,[1] to have helped ensure submission of the United States’ amicus brief in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(Class 46) Reminiscences on ‘i Intel’ (Class 46) Portugal Portugal makes extra-budgetary contribution to WIPO capacity building projects (WIPO) Spain The Princess and the Trade Mark Office - High Court of Catalunya overturns SPTO refusal of Spanish trade mark applications for Letizia de Giorgi marks (Class 46) United Kingdom Professor Adrian Sterling’s orphan works scheme (IPKat) Movie industry: London ‘fake-free… [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
If he thinks the prison at Guantanamo still has a role in national security or that it provides some benefit to the United States, I welcome his views. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
The most substantial e-discovery costs arise from the attorney review process, regardless of whether that review is done internally by firm lawyers or outsourced to vendors in the United States or abroad. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
Google doesn't want you to limit its ability to follow you around the internet http://t.co/9vYzPQjxcK -> RT @eurorights: 'French blogger owes $2,000 in damages for review 'too prominent' on Google'. http://t.co/UHMDvye7hC -> RT @thenetmonitor: Putin signs law that could end up blocking Facebook and Twitter in Russia http://t.co/gXCDBlKZps -> RT @PrivacyDigest: 26 Questions EU Regulators Want Google to Answer – Digits – WSJ http://t.co/wx2qjD1yBp ->… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
In relation to the transfer of Russian assets in particular, the United States has been reported as endorsing countermeasures adopted “by states ‘injured’ and ‘specially affected’ by [the Russian] aggression” against Ukraine. [read post]
