Search for: "Wife J. v. Husband J." Results 81 - 100 of 720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
If Wilson J’s views were followed to their logical conclusion the wife would have marks deducted when it came to a contribution based assessment. [read post]
Whilst the financially weaker party (usually the wife) may feel in their bones that the husband is not being truthful in his financial presentation, proving this has always been the challenge. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm by Annette Burns
[Husband/ Wife] is ordered to execute and deliver IRS Form 8332 releasing the exemption to [Husband/ Wife]. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:44 pm by Matheu Nunn
As part of their settlement agreement they agree that Husband will pay Wife alimony subject to an anti-Lepis provision (based on Lepis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:44 pm by Matheu Nunn
As part of their settlement agreement they agree that Husband will pay Wife alimony subject to an anti-Lepis provision (based on Lepis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
The permanent damage that internet publications can inflict is very much the focus of Tugendhat J’s assessment of damages in the case of ZAM v CFW & Anor [2013] EWHC 662 (QB), encapsulated in the memorable description he quoted in an earlier judgment: “what is to be found on the internet may become like a tattoo“. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
  Nicol J held that the allegations against Mr Depp that he was a “wife beater” were substantially true and that his claim for libel therefore failed. [read post]