Search for: "Williams, C. v. DOC" Results 81 - 95 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
William Samek, a key state witness,clarification of his original trial testimony. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
A step behind: (Spicy IP),Proposals for ISPs to terminate infringers go (even more) global: (LawFont.com),Five ways to minimize risk of copyright liability from citizen media: (IP ADR Blog), Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralMillennium Pharmaceuticals spent $1.28 million on lobbying for patent reform and biologics legislation in 2007: (Patent Docs),New Thai Minister may review compulsory licences on cancer drugs: (Intellectual Property… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
Box 20287 Reno, NV 89515-0287 Phone: (775) 853-4019 Southern Nevada Head Injury Association c/o Nevada Community Enrichment Program 6375 West Charleston Blvd. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:18 am
For publication opinions today (3): William McDermott v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C-FJG,2006 WL 1779035, (W.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
The choice of drugs is left entirely to the DOC. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
§301(c)(2), even if the diversion was not intended as a returnof capital. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, 283 F.3d 315, 321 (5th Cir. 2002), and Williams v. [read post]