Search for: "Williams, et al v. University Federal" Results 81 - 100 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If the motion is granted, the court of appeals shall reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.MARIA DEL CARMEN GUILBOT SERROS DE GONZALEZ, ET AL. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 term, saw a surprising and important decision handed down in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Warren, The Deductibility by Individuals of Capital Losses under the Federal Income Tax, 40 The University of Chicago Law Review 291-326 (1973). [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Aramark Foods; 2000 Jury Verdicts LEXIS 60403 Lucasfilm Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Johnson is the managing trustee for the William S. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of… [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm by Unknown
Bruhl does not cite specific examples, but highlights of this impressive body of work include William Richman & William Reynolds, Injustice on Appeal(2012); Bert Huang, “Lightened Scrutiny,” 124 Harv. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 172, Forthcoming. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]