Search for: "Williams v. London"
Results 81 - 100
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
Speakers include Mr Justice Arnold (High Court of Justice, London), Judge Rian Kalden (Court of Appeal of The Hague), Hon. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:29 pm
Taxation of land values and the single tax [electronic resource] / by William Smart WASTE. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
(London: Routledge), Forthcoming).Victor C. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
Mrs Trump’s case against the Daily Mail in the High Court in London continues. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Drawing by Isobel Williams Listed for two days from Tuesday are the linked matters of R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
The case of the day is Constellation Energy Commodities Group Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:58 am
Article 8 has had a great impact on UK law on investigatory powers (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act) and on family law (Tchenguiz v Imerman). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law writes in with the following comments on yesterday’s Clapper decision: The Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday in Clapper v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
Mark Zieg, a software engineer who blogs at London Crackers said, It already is legal. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
We are anxious to see how the identity and special qualities of Inner London can be preserved following the transfer; and even to hope that the Registry would be prepared to adopt some of Inner London’s many qualities. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am
New London, which upheld the city of New London's seizure of private land for development. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:55 pm
”As the Connecticut Supreme Court observed in the 1999 in the definitive case of Babcock v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
Her widely cited dissenting opinion in Kelo v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery (2020) EWCA Civ 104 This is the latest round of what is becoming the most heavily litigated stretch of air space in London, assorted leaseholders of Neo Bankside against the Tate Modern, over the overlooking of their flats (plate glass walls and all) from the viewing platform on the Tate Modern extension. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery (2020) EWCA Civ 104 This is the latest round of what is becoming the most heavily litigated stretch of air space in London, assorted leaseholders of Neo Bankside against the Tate Modern, over the overlooking of their flats (plate glass walls and all) from the viewing platform on the Tate Modern extension. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of… [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
