Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
" In other words, objecting students can still complete 100% of their usual classroom activities. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:07 am
The Judge acknowledged the impact on Mr R, but referenced the words of Lord Sumption JSC in Solihull Metropolitan Council v Hickin (2012) UKSC 39 “Any system of statutory protection which deals with interests as varied as residential tenancies and depends for its practical operation on the accidents of cohabitation, matrimonial break-up and death will inevitably give rise to anomalies at the margins. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
He had some pretty strong words about the decision of his predecessor Sir James Munby in a case called A v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Now, 29 blogposts, four evidence submissions and over 100,000 words later, is there anything left worth saying about the Bill? [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
Now, 29 blogposts, four evidence submissions and over 100,000 words later, is there anything left worth saying about the Bill? [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
That word “truly” reminds us that our hope is not an illusion, but the truth! [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
In that great old case, Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
” As Lord Robertson said, giving the judgment of the Privy Council in Eastern and South African Telegraph Co v Cape Town Tramways Co Ltd (1902) AC 381 at 393: “A man cannot increase the liabilities of his neighbour by applying his own property to special uses, whether for business or pleasure. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
In other words, a defence (if that is what it was) of having carried out a proportionate and necessary examination was too vague to pass the legality test. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
Lord Hamblen (with whom Lord Hodge, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales agreed) gave the majority opinion of the court, with Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
Data privacy and data protection Former PM, Sir Tony Blair and Lord Hague have backed the government’s plans to introduce digital ID cards, the BBC reports. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The case concerns whether the Supreme Court should depart from the judgment of the House of Lords in Buchanan (under the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234) and hold that excise duty payable in respect of goods which are stolen in the course of international carriage by road cannot be claimed under Article 23(4) of the CMR because excise duty does not fall within the words “carriage charges, Customs duties and other charges incurred in respect… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
On the moment the news broke about Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 3:13 am
Lord Briggs dissented. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 4:28 pm
On 21 December 2022 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Briggs, Hamblen and Leggatt) granted the defendant permission to appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am
" [In the words of] Lord Matthew Hale and William Blackstone, "[T]hough a man be violently assaulted, and hath no other possible means of escaping death, but by killing an innocent person; this fear and force shall not acquit him of murder; for he ought rather to die himself, than escape by the murder of an innocent. [read post]
