Search for: "Yeager v Yeager" Results 81 - 100 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
John Yeager, who argued the defense side in Kreiner’s companion case, Straub v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:38 am
 Here's a recap of the collateral estoppel argument before the SCOTUS in  Yeager  v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 8:02 am
Click here for the judge’s ruling in Friskit v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:48 pm
Docket: 08-22 Title: Caperton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the applicant could not prove under Title VII or state law that his religious beliefs conflicted with an employment requirement, there was no reason for the court to decide whether he failed to establish a prima facie case, or that violating a federal statute—here the Internal Revenue Code’s requirement for employers to collect and provide it with employee Social Security numbers—would be an undue hardship on his employer (Yeager v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am by Daniel E. Cummins
No. 09-10116 (Butler Co., June 11, 2009, Yeager, J.) [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Scott Yeager, a former EBS executive. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Some states do read their public accommodations statutes as requiring religious exemptions, see, e.g., Yeager v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
No. 09-10116 (Butler Co., June 11, 2009, Yeager, J.) [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:33 pm
Judge Barteau writes:Case Corporation, Case IH, Case Equipment Corporation, Case LLC, CNH America LLC (collectively "Case") bring this petition for rehearing, requesting that we reconsider our conclusion that the trial court erred by granting Case's motion to strike the expert affidavit of Walter Yeager ("Yeager"). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
HupkaCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Public Office Forfeiture"Forfeiture of all future public employment was not appropriately ordered where defendant's offense was not related directly to his performance in, or circumstances flowing from, his specific public offices" FEDERAL DECISIONS: Yeager v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
HupkaCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Public Office Forfeiture"Forfeiture of all future public employment was not appropriately ordered where defendant's offense was not related directly to his performance in, or circumstances flowing from, his specific public offices" FEDERAL DECISIONS: Yeager v. [read post]