Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 81 - 100
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2007, 8:51 am
Taylor of Zuckerman Spaeder contends that Mr. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:46 am
Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to those parts of the first cross motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562, 404 N.E.2d 718, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
“Defendant has established that the malpractice claim fails for multiple reasons, and plaintiffs have failed to raise any triable issues (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Sabalza v Salgado, 85 AD3d 436, 437 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
Yesudian v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:44 am
Zuckerman does not say what it says. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:51 am
Defendants, however, failed to establish as a matter of law that the complaint in the ECWA action would have been dismissed on that ground (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:05 am
Related links: Powers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
No breach of restrictive covenant in Nlogic Inc. v Microtherapy Inc., 2017 ONSC 722 https://t.co/3H9kXUraHm -> CASL Workshop: Preparing Yourself for the Private Right of Action Coming in July https://t.co/R9bIrgUq6n -> Google, Waze Reach Deal In GPS App Maker's Copyright Suit https://t.co/hbFcf402v7 -> Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions but not rest of issues https://t.co/mfye8Tlx47 -> Chinese pirates are facing lifelong… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:50 am
Defendants failed to meet their initial burden on those parts of the motion concerning those claims (see Pignataro, 38 AD3d 1320; see generally Zuckerman, 49 NY2d at 562). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am
Defendants failed to meet their initial burden on those parts of the motion concerning those claims (see Pignataro, 38 AD3d 1320; see generally Zuckerman, 49 NY2d at 562). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:41 am
The full ARB is considering whether an earlier 2-to-1 ARB panel decision in Fordham v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 1:12 pm
In opposition to Liberty's motion and in support of its cross motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact or establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, respectively, so as to preclude the award of summary judgment to Liberty (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Four key takeaways from the Supreme Court's decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:29 am
Kohn Executive Director, National Whistleblower Center and Founding Member of Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, LLP Moderated by Jason Zuckerman, Principal, The Employment Law Group [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
, 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:35 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am
") (internal quotation marks omitted); Zuckerman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co., 55 AD3d 879, 880-881), and defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
In Wortman v. [read post]
